Whoa! I guess Justin Timberlake was trying to make the terrible halftime show more exciting when he did this:
http://www.eurotechniks.com/zerin/janet_superbowl.avi
It's kinda scary to think that she almost looks like Michael Jackson with boobs... :confused: :whistle:

Did he say something? All there wuz wuz an audio that lasted 3 seconds.... maybe it's just me.. :freak:

Yah, I saw the half-time show. It wuz horrible. What is with the rap music? And Kid Rock? I liked him better at country but now I like him less for turning back and singing like a rapper! He wuz so gross!! As for Justin and Janet- I cannot stand them both so I just couldn't watch. What happened? :huh:


No one looks like Michael Jackson... Michael Jackson looks like Michael Jackson. NO ONE ON THIS PLANET LOOKS WORSE OR EVEN CLOSE!!!!!!!!! He looks like an alien! :eek:

i finally saw her boobs....i finally saw her boobs....i finally saw her boobs....i finally saw her boobs....i finally saw her boobs....i finally saw her boobs.... .. ugh.... now what?

ohhhh its just 1 boob......

That's really funny! Did that actually happen?!

lol, i bet that was planned.

what a coincidence that janet jackson has this stylish piercing exactly around the nipple that was "flashed" and justin t. reveals it just when he's singing "gotta have you naked by the end of this song" :)

That's true, the acting looked a little weird when he took it off. It did look very planned.

It was totally planned.
And I believe that's a "sticker" (silver star or something) on her boob, not a piercing.

CBS ( the station broadcasting the game) apologized for this and claims it wasn't planned

Originally posted by trailergod
i finally saw her boobs....(abridged) .... .. ugh.... now what?

TO THE THIRD BASE, SOLDIERS! :big grin:

and for a close up.... LOL....

http://www.drudgereport.com/mattjj.htm





























RATED R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!









http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/afp/20040202/capt.sge.gpf28.020204190949.photo02.default-350x274.jpg
http://www.drudgereport.com/jjt.jpg




ohhh thats a HOT piercing..lol

hehe you think janets little problem is an issue :P

<a href="http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,8569954%255E421,00.html"><img src="http://news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,3600,318277,00.jpg" border="0"><br>Schoolbook Porn?? anyone?!?!</a>

lol, some pics maybe....:D


anyway

TiVo: Jackson stunt most replayed moment everLOS ANGELES, California (Hollywood Reporter) -- When Justin Timberlake tore at Janet Jackson's leather outfit during Sunday's Super Bowl half-time show, TiVo users took notice. Then they took notice again and again, using the digital video recorder to replay the event and to pause at the crucial moment in order to discern just what it was that Jackson had revealed to millions of Americans.
http://us.cnn.com/2004/TECH/ptech/02/03/television.tivo.reut/index.html

LOL!!!

wow, now thats a suprise :)
from imdb:
Pop singer Janet Jackson has confessed to planning her breast exposure during a live TV transmission of this year's American football Super Bowl. The star, 37, shocked 89 million viewers during a raunchy half- time dance with superstar Justin Timberlake, during which he ripped open her bustier to reveal a naked, pierced right breast. Timberlake, 22, has already taken the blame for the incident, but now Jackson has come forward to admit the whole thing was choreographed moments before the performance, which was organized by MTV bosses. In a statement on MTV's website, Jackson says, "The decision to have a costume reveal at the end of my half-time show performance was made after final rehearsals. MTV was completely unaware of it. It was not my intention that it go as far as it did. I apologize to anyone offended - including the audience, MTV, CBS and the NFL." But America's decency watchdogs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are less than pleased with the unexpected nudity. Chairman Michael Powell says, "I am outraged at what I saw. Like millions of Americans, my family and I gathered around the television for a celebration. Instead, that celebration was tainted by a classless, crass and deplorable stunt. I have instructed the commission to open an immediate investigation into the broadcast. It will be thorough and swift."

I say ban all breast in the world!...lol

you wait... there will be an enquiry into all streakers from now on!!!

Originally posted by Jake
I say ban all breast in the world!...

Fine. We'll just have oysters and snails then. :D

LOL!

...and this is just pissing me off

I love "ER" and they're just taking the fallout for Janet

Nervous NBC edits 'ER' breast shot LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Janet Jackson's revealing Super Bowl halftime moment has created fallout for "ER," with NBC removing a glimpse of an elderly patient's breast in Thursday's episode. The network said Wednesday it had "unfortunately concluded that the atmosphere created by this week's events has made it too difficult for many of our affiliates to air this shot."

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/TV/02/05/tv.er.breast.ap/index.html

I just dont get how it can be seen as such a big deal

Originally posted by Gaumont
I just dont get how it can be seen as such a big deal
me too.
they're also changing the live delay for the grammy's and oscar's from 5 seconds to 5 minutes so they can remove offensive material :rolleyes:

i hear builders are planning stop work meetings since they cant cuss on the worksite anymore... tis a sad day!

from 5 seconds to 5 minutes so they can remove offensive material
WHAT? How offensive is offensive material?

Last year's Micheal Moore speach, is that offensive? It certainly has to be, because they seemed not pleased about it. Does that mean they would remove something similar this year?

And what if some 'offensive' materials actually last for longer than 5 minutes? Would there be black in between?... :evil:

Originally posted by editman
And what if some 'offensive' materials actually last for longer than 5 minutes? Would there be black in between?... :evil:
hehe, i thought about that too. what if they can't get somebody off the stage for 5 minutes?
does this mean everyone afterwards can curse how they want and show what they want? ;)

i guess michael moore's speech would have been rated too offensive to air.

hail to censorship :rolleyes:

While I don't think they should go this far, this is all business

These TV shows and awards don't want to face the same problems as JAnet Jackson is facing, they choose to censor some stuff because they believe it will be bad for them. It's as simple as that.

With the editing of inappropriate material during the grammy broadcast we may end up with a bunch of editers getting beaten up Russell Crowe style, if you get my meaning.

Originally posted by SharkmanSIX
With the editing of inappropriate material during the grammy broadcast we may end up with a bunch of editers getting beaten up Russell Crowe style, if you get my meaning.

It's time like this editman's glad he's not (yet) working in Hollywood, or any mainstream media, or working with Russell Crowe, cos I won't get beaten up by Rusty for doing my job, hehehe...

(Russell beats up an editor)
EDITOR: Sorry, Russell, you can't sing The Hills Are Alive!
(THAWK!)

Seriously, though, no one cares over here. Maybe we are perverts. Or maybe it's your TV stations OVER-REACTING! Do they have 5 year olds in charge? Woah! It's a boob! It not like anyone hasen't seen that before! And guess what Janet was promoting - her new single.

Originally posted by I Got Trailers
Seriously, though, no one cares over here. Maybe we are perverts.
lol, i don't think that's pervert.
i don't know about the uk, but at least here in germany there are boobs in commercials shown in the afternoon.
i don't know what's so wrong with that, do american tv stations think children could get sexually disturbed by seeing a naked woman? it's not like justin timberlake fu**ed janet jackson on stage. :whistle:

I don't think they should show breasts during daytime TV because I don't know, the kids get stressed out or something I odn't know, but why would we have rated R and so on if we could see it on TV anytime. I think kids should learn about it from stolen Playboy magazines and so on, not from mainstream media

do american tv stations think children could get sexually disturbed by seeing a naked woman?
I don't remember who had this signature here in the forum, but it sums this up very nicely..

"If you suck on a tit the movie gets an R rating. If you hack the tit off with an axe it will be PG." - Jack Nicholson

Originally posted by wireframe9

I don't remember who had this signature here in the forum, but it sums this up very nicely..

"If you suck on a tit the movie gets an R rating. If you hack the tit off with an axe it will be PG." - Jack Nicholson
that was me :)

edit:
ROFL, omg, just heard on tv that a woman sued justin and janet for several million dollars because she is in a state of shock since she saw the performance:rolleyes:

hehehe Gollumichel :P

did anyone see that commerical for Saturday Night Live for last nite (the 7th) last week?

That lady from Will and Grace (you know with the annoying voice) and a guy that looked like Clay Aiken wuz standing in front of the TV saying... "Yah watch the show blah blah blah... the lady said something.. "I wanna see ya naked" to Clay Aiken. So then she tore off his shirt pocket and you could see his nipple... and she started dancing at him. Clay said, "Oh that wuzn't supposed to happen!"


hehe, yah i kinda chuckled there for a bit... :P

now it's getting really sick:
from imdb
"In yet another fallout from the Super Bowl halftime error, MTV has notified record companies that at least eight videos, including recent performances by Britney Spears, Maroon 5 and Blink 182, have been pulled from daytime airing to "overnight" programming because of sexual and political content. An MTV spokeswoman told today's (Monday) Los Angeles Times: "We support the creative community, but we have to take into account what's in the culture right now. ... It's part of our responsibility as broadcasters."

what exactly is political content that can't be shown after janet jackson flahing her nipple?
i also can't see why the two women kissing in the new blink 182 video are now more offensive than before

traumatizes the homosexuals...hehe...let them be traumatized

I wonder if Janet has been egged yet... Shes probally ruined live broadcasting forever! Now each special broadcast will be edited before viewing!

it will settle down.. things will return to normal sooner or later :D the public will end up demanding it... hehe

I can';t believe we're still yammering on about something that lasted the grand total of 2 seconds.

And BTW, the 5 minute delay still didn't stop the Grammy's from getting Celine Dion's mic to work.

hehe...I wonder if that was planned

hehehe funny...

http://www.rock103.com/crew/pics/monalisa.jpg

LOL
Hey... We cant swear on this forum but he can show Mona Lisas breast! What kind of word is this!

hehe, I said "breast":D

I can't believe I'm still hearing about this in the news. Here's my take on it. People who are freaking out about it are just doing it for the sake of freaking out. I saw the live broadcast, and I could barely even tell what happened, and we were watching it on a BIG SCREEN. We had Tivo on there and we actually hadda rewind it and frame thru it to see what happened. All these women "oh my kids, my poor kids, so warped" no they weren't, chances are they didn't even see what happened or think anything of it until mother hen flipped out about it and probably played it back 50 times in front of her POOR kids. Now think about this... one of my friends said this and it was funny but true...
When you're little you're taught to love breasts (breast feeding), then, for a little while it's inappropriate for you to see, then once you turn 18 hey it's ok go buy some hardcore porno! The world is so stupid. :rolleyes:

Originally posted by Mark Strube
The world is so stupid. :rolleyes:
considering sex and nudity: not everywhere :P:whistle:

No but crap like this just adds to and proves the overall stupidity of the world. :evil:

Originally posted by Mark Strube
No but crap like this just adds to and proves the overall stupidity of the world. :evil: Hey, don't blame the world for one country full of idiots. :whistle:

No controversy here on the matter, we have live broadcasts that feature purposfully accidental nudity all the time and people laugh it off, noone cares here, and in other parts of the world they show soft porn, by some standards, in their ads, so ~I wouldn't blame the world. :P

we dont have any censurship in my country... we got naked ppl on the TV all the time hehe...... and national stations show hardcore porn after midnight.... and you can have TV showes showing Breast Implant Surgery at 15.00 no problem... :)

The national news channel even showed this Janet clip in SlowMotion all day after the SB.... i saw it at 13.00 when i came home from work :) none blured or censured...

Fed7haS

Originally posted by carl
Hey, don't blame the world for one country full of idiots. :whistle:

No controversy here on the matter, we have live broadcasts that feature purposfully accidental nudity all the time and people laugh it off, noone cares here, and in other parts of the world they show soft porn, by some standards, in their ads, so ~I wouldn't blame the world. :P

Well, you're missing my point. I was speaking in the broader range of things... not just nipples on tv. ;)

It was not Janet!!!! look!!!

:P

http://imgsrv.fun4fun.com/public_html/Binnes/12022004/images/mikejan.jpg

The Plot thickens.

it has happened... this is it!


i am tramatized for life.... :freak:

Originally posted by radstar
it has happened... this is it!


i am tramatized for life.... :freak: How do you think Justin feels? :eek:

Originally posted by carl
How do you think Justin feels? :eek:

I think she was referring to the pic JM sent. Man I've got tramatized by that Photoshoped pic as well.

At least, the real Janet looks like human...

Originally posted by editman
At least, the real Janet looks like human...
but imo she looked way better a few years ago.
she's starting to get too artificial for my taste.

<b>I am outraged that i had to look at that</b>, as an incredibly conservative Australian gentleman, I feel violated having to look at such obscenity. This website should go under review, children could see that picture what are you lot all thinking! CENSORSHIP!!!

You all know what I’m referring to!!!!
<img src="http://www.movie-list.com/forum/avatar.php?userid=882&dateline=1036385221">

hehe :P

you dont see too many people making a fuss over this pic...

<img src="http://www.movie-list.com/forum/attachment.php?s=&postid=77403">

Well, that's because you only see a part of her nipple. And after her video, the world knows she's a slut so this sort of thing is expected!

is that the girl named after the hotel and that french city? hehe

Rich, I strongly recommend you Photoshopping your head over the guy's. :D

(Better still, find a pic of your better half and... nah I won't go into that.)