Thanks: 1
View Poll Results: Do you think the lawsuit makes sense?
- Voters
- 15. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes, $20 million is a lot of money. They were right to expect her not to wear other watches.
3 20.00% -
No, the company bought an endorsement, but it does not mean they own the actress.
3 20.00% -
Not sure, maybe she should not wear rival companies' products in public.
2 13.33% -
I want a $20 Million Endorsement Deal too!! How Do I Get One?
1 6.67% -
I have no opinions.
6 40.00%
Results 1 to 15 of 104
Threaded View
-
02-13-2007, 10:52 PM #11
Ultimate Trailer Fan
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Greenfield, IN (near Indianapolis), USA
- Posts
- 1,775
- Credits
- 1,110
I think it depends on the contract that was signed. It should be specified in the contract that she only wears watches from that one company and no one else, otherwise, I don't see how he has a legal case. But I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know.
Reply With QuoteSimilar Threads
-
2006 MTV Movie Awards Nominees
By Mithrandir01 in forum General Chatter - Movie RelatedReplies: 4Last Post: 04-26-2006, 09:26 AM -
North Country (Charlize Theron)
By editman in forum Trailer NewsReplies: 3Last Post: 10-22-2005, 09:46 PM -
Charlize Theron in Aeon Flux?!
By Gaumont in forum Movie NewsReplies: 7Last Post: 05-12-2005, 03:57 AM -
Charlize Theron
By neo_anderson in forum General Chatter - Movie RelatedReplies: 3Last Post: 12-18-2003, 12:14 PM -
Monster (Charlize Theron cri/dra/thr)
By ZUBi in forum Trailer NewsReplies: 8Last Post: 12-13-2003, 06:18 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Bookmarks