Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ottawa, ON - Canada
    Posts
    3,237
    Credits
    443

    Alvin and the Chipmunks


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,608
    Credits
    450
    clip is not available in my area :'(

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ottawa, ON - Canada
    Posts
    3,237
    Credits
    443

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Mel, AU
    Posts
    5,701
    Credits
    450
    AOL/Moviefone Quicktime trailer direct links:
    low-res (12.6MB): http://pdl.stream.aol.com/aol/us/mov..._01_700_dl.mov
    hi-res (27MB): http://pdl.stream.aol.com/aol/us/mov...01_1500_dl.mov

    HD links: see post above

    "The idea was to be a symbol. editman could be anybody, that was the point."

    Trolls destroyed the Forum

    my DVD/blu-ray List

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    259
    Credits
    5
    Please tell me that this is only a very bad nightmare!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Mississauga, ON Canada
    Posts
    1,858
    Credits
    450
    Theatre went nuts went this played. I personally can't wait to see it!
    You're waiting for a train, a train that will take you far away. You know where you hope this train will take you, but you can't be sure. But it doesn't matter - because we'll be together.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    335
    Credits
    453
    Why nightmare? This could be fun...it's good to see my old cartoons getting a movie time

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    259
    Credits
    5
    I was fine with the trailer, until the poop incident! Other than that, yeah I will admit that the movie looks interesting.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    the plywood state
    Posts
    1,756
    Credits
    451
    you have just got to be joking....
    "I hate to advocate weird chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone …
    but they've always worked for me,"

    Hunter S.Thompson


    for all you newbs, use the SEARCH function ... it works.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    335
    Credits
    453
    hahaah the poop incident... yucky...but the chipmunks are so cute man...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    225
    Credits
    8
    Looks good, I don't know why people are beefing about it. It kinda brought back a little bit of nostalgia from our childhood. I also like that live action Garfield with Bill Murray doing the voice too. I'm just a sucka for old stuff.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Prague, Czech Republic
    Posts
    3,759
    Credits
    20
    why are people beefing about it? coz its a crap? coz its the most f....ed up thing since second Garfield? Coz it just looks soooo stupid?
    I stand with red bear. Btw JP wrote a blog about it...and he thinks pretty much the same, just aint that offensive
    Cmon, you are grown-ups, arent you??!! Besides that teaser is pretty retarded.
    Me angry! Where´s my food!

    My DVD Collection, My Blu-ray collection

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Mel, AU
    Posts
    5,701
    Credits
    450
    Quicktime HD teaser from Yahoo:
    480p (25.7MB) http://playlist.yahoo.com/makeplayli...&sdm=web&pt=rd
    720p (66.8MB) http://playlist.yahoo.com/makeplayli...&sdm=web&pt=rd
    1080p (98.5MB) http://playlist.yahoo.com/makeplayli...&sdm=web&pt=rd

    Quote Originally Posted by st39.6 View Post
    ... its the most f....ed up thing since second Garfield? Coz it just looks soooo stupid?
    I stand with red bear. Btw JP wrote a blog about it...and he thinks pretty much the same, just aint that offensive ...
    I bid to differ.

    To my understanding the Garfield movies (and, based on the teaser, Alvin and the Chipmunks) are more family and kids oriented rather than a faithful adaptation of the comic strip/TV series. True to the eyes of internet fanboys the movies may not look impressive, or that certain parts of the movie, if not the entire movies, are silly - the supposely poop joke in the Chipmunks teaser, Garfield and Odie dancing together in Garfield 1 etc. One may dislike a movie because one happens to be not the targeted audience or the movie doesn't meet one's expectation, or because some scenes give one goosebumps. Saying the movie is stupid or f....ed up because of that, though, is like judging a book by the cover, completely disregarding any merits the movie has, IMO.

    By that rationale someone can say Transformers is f....ed up because Megatrons doesn't transform into a pistol or the main human characters aren't oilrag workers named Spike and Sparkplug, or all the Harry Potter films are f....ed up as well cos lots of subplots in the books were cut out because of time. Does that automatically make the films totally unworthy of viewing?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    225
    Credits
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by st39.6 View Post
    coz its a crap? coz its the most f....ed up thing since second Garfield?
    Most of everything from the 80's are just dump stupid fun. It's what made it cool to watch no matter how it was presented. Of course nothing matches up to the original source.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    335
    Credits
    453
    Hmm nicely said editman.That's what I thought as well. Garfield and the upcoming Alvin do indeed look kinda corny and crappy but they are still fun movies for the family. Entertaining enough for a single watch I feel. They ain't the best but ain't sucky as well. Personally, I'll be watching Alvin for the sake of nostalgia...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •