Thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 23
Thread: T3 -> (only) 109 minutes long
-
T3 -> (only) 109 minutes long
from dark horizons:
Terminator 3: A final runtime of 109 minutes is set - almost half an hour shorter than T2.
let's just hope it doesn't suck!
-
I'd say a run time of 110 mins was pretty decent, but since when does a films running time dictate it's quality.
-
Exactly... sometimes I'd prefer a good movie that's short and sweet.
-
My gut feeling is: T3 is like Jurassic Park III to the original and The Lost World. If you like JP3 then maybe T3 can get away with it.
"The idea was to be a symbol. editman could be anybody, that was the point."
Trolls destroyed the Forum
my DVD/blu-ray List
-
06-03-2003, 07:30 AM #5
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- No place like 127.0.0.1
- Posts
- 1,387
- Credits
- 1,103
i was thinking the same thing editman i happened to like Jp3, but i still dont think it lived up to the first 2.. which is what i think T3 is going to be like.. but ya never know....
[My Top 20 Movies@Ymdb] - ([)(]) Dolby Digital the choice of ML's - [~My Place ~]
{Drag The Sunrise Down: You know the light can hypnotise, so shut it out and close your eyes - Rooster}
-
Originally posted by Stormwalker
i was thinking the same thing editman i happened to like Jp3, but i still dont think it lived up to the first 2.. which is what i think T3 is going to be like.. but ya never know....
-
I think, entertainment wise, TLW is the best of the series. JP3 was just rubbish IMO.
Are you a Mexi-CAN or a Mexi-CAN'T?
-
hmmm...well, i'm not expecting much from this movie. so i guess i can put up with 110 minutes of "why on earth did they do this?" going on in the back of my head while i am sitting in agony watching a 50 yr old man try to play a 28 yr old character that died over 10 years ago.....
...maybe it is because i thought JP3 blew as well...."I hate to advocate weird chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone …
but they've always worked for me,"
Hunter S.Thompson
-
06-03-2003, 07:19 PM #9
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- No place like 127.0.0.1
- Posts
- 1,387
- Credits
- 1,103
yeah 3 was better than 2.. but only cause they didnt follow the book enough.. if spielberg had followed what crichton had actually written 2 would have been sooo much better.. but i digress.. i was just trying to use it as an example of a trilogy where the 3rd act was made many years after the 2nd
-
Terminator 3....hmmmmm, I don't know, I am hoping to god it's good, but man, there are a few things that get me down about it....I wanted Ed Furlong back, if for nothing else other than continuity......and I wanted Brad Fiedel back to do the score, marco Beltrami, * yawn * and he's not going to use the THEME????!?!??!!!!!......at least I'm gonna get a Guns 'N' Roses song....
-
06-05-2003, 10:40 PM #11
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- About 5 Miles From Kaihoro
- Posts
- 159
- Credits
- 1,085
better than 90
-
gooddy gooddy
http://us.imdb.com/Title?0181852
MPAA: Rated R for strong sci-fi violence and action, and for language and brief nudity.
-
indeed it's good news.
mmm boobies.
-
Originally posted by blugh
mmm boobies.
-
06-11-2003, 03:40 AM #15Trailer Collector
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- The Netherlands
- Posts
- 252
- Credits
- 1,105
i bet 'coincedently' the hair of the TX falls over the boobs, so you cant see ****
ahh well, ill like this movie with or without the TX tits man! far out!!:big grin:
Similar Threads
-
T3 12 minutes videos
By trailergod in forum Movie NewsReplies: 2Last Post: 01-06-2003, 09:25 PM -
T3 Trailer Re-edit
By RoboDan in forum Trailer NewsReplies: 11Last Post: 12-24-2002, 03:18 AM
Bookmarks