Thanks Thanks:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
  1. 06-02-2003, 09:56 AM #1
    impetigo's Avatar
    impetigo
    impetigo is offline Trailer Fanatic
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    315
    Credits
    1,065

    T3 -> (only) 109 minutes long

    from dark horizons:

    Terminator 3: A final runtime of 109 minutes is set - almost half an hour shorter than T2.


    let's just hope it doesn't suck!


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-02-2003, 10:25 AM #2
    carl's Avatar
    carl
    carl is offline ML Encoder
    Send a message via MSN to carl Send a message via Yahoo to carl
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,685
    Credits
    1,085
    I'd say a run time of 110 mins was pretty decent, but since when does a films running time dictate it's quality.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-02-2003, 10:57 AM #3
    Shrubz's Avatar
    Shrubz
    Shrubz is offline Super Mod / Encoder
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,543
    Credits
    1,063
    Exactly... sometimes I'd prefer a good movie that's short and sweet.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-02-2003, 06:23 PM #4
    editman's Avatar
    editman
    editman is offline rises
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Mel, AU
    Posts
    5,079
    Credits
    1,091
    My gut feeling is: T3 is like Jurassic Park III to the original and The Lost World. If you like JP3 then maybe T3 can get away with it.

    "The idea was to be a symbol. editman could be anybody, that was the point."

    Trolls destroyed the Forum
    my DVD/blu-ray List
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-03-2003, 07:30 AM #5
    Stormwalker's Avatar
    Stormwalker
    Stormwalker is offline Ultimate Trailer Fan
    Send a message via ICQ to Stormwalker Send a message via MSN to Stormwalker
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    No place like 127.0.0.1
    Posts
    1,399
    Credits
    1,103
    i was thinking the same thing editman i happened to like Jp3, but i still dont think it lived up to the first 2.. which is what i think T3 is going to be like.. but ya never know....


    [My Top 20 Movies@Ymdb] - ([)(]) Dolby Digital the choice of ML's - [~My Place ~]

    {Drag The Sunrise Down: You know the light can hypnotise, so shut it out and close your eyes - Rooster}
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-03-2003, 08:06 AM #6
    carl's Avatar
    carl
    carl is offline ML Encoder
    Send a message via MSN to carl Send a message via Yahoo to carl
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,685
    Credits
    1,085
    Originally posted by Stormwalker
    i was thinking the same thing editman i happened to like Jp3, but i still dont think it lived up to the first 2.. which is what i think T3 is going to be like.. but ya never know....
    I thought JP3 was much better than the lost world, which had nothing, and I mean nothing to do with the book.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-03-2003, 02:04 PM #7
    blugh's Avatar
    blugh
    blugh is offline Trailer Master
    Send a message via ICQ to blugh Send a message via AIM to blugh
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, ON, Canada
    Posts
    949
    Credits
    1,075
    I think, entertainment wise, TLW is the best of the series. JP3 was just rubbish IMO.
    Are you a Mexi-CAN or a Mexi-CAN'T?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 06-03-2003, 05:34 PM #8
    redbear's Avatar
    redbear
    redbear is offline now i feel like a putz
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    the plywood state
    Posts
    1,617
    Credits
    1,072
    hmmm...well, i'm not expecting much from this movie. so i guess i can put up with 110 minutes of "why on earth did they do this?" going on in the back of my head while i am sitting in agony watching a 50 yr old man try to play a 28 yr old character that died over 10 years ago.....


    ...maybe it is because i thought JP3 blew as well....
    "I hate to advocate weird chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone …
    but they've always worked for me,"
    Hunter S.Thompson
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 06-03-2003, 07:19 PM #9
    Stormwalker's Avatar
    Stormwalker
    Stormwalker is offline Ultimate Trailer Fan
    Send a message via ICQ to Stormwalker Send a message via MSN to Stormwalker
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    No place like 127.0.0.1
    Posts
    1,399
    Credits
    1,103
    yeah 3 was better than 2.. but only cause they didnt follow the book enough.. if spielberg had followed what crichton had actually written 2 would have been sooo much better.. but i digress.. i was just trying to use it as an example of a trilogy where the 3rd act was made many years after the 2nd
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 06-05-2003, 05:24 AM #10
    Dutch_Schafer's Avatar
    Dutch_Schafer
    Dutch_Schafer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    96
    Credits
    1,085
    Terminator 3....hmmmmm, I don't know, I am hoping to god it's good, but man, there are a few things that get me down about it....I wanted Ed Furlong back, if for nothing else other than continuity......and I wanted Brad Fiedel back to do the score, marco Beltrami, * yawn * and he's not going to use the THEME????!?!??!!!!!......at least I'm gonna get a Guns 'N' Roses song....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 06-05-2003, 10:40 PM #11
    HamishT's Avatar
    HamishT
    HamishT is offline Wish I Was Psychic
    Send a message via MSN to HamishT
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    About 5 Miles From Kaihoro
    Posts
    159
    Credits
    1,085
    better than 90
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 06-10-2003, 04:51 PM #12
    trailergod's Avatar
    trailergod
    trailergod is offline Obsessed Trailer Nut
    Send a message via ICQ to trailergod Send a message via MSN to trailergod
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    4,002
    Credits
    1,105
    gooddy gooddy

    http://us.imdb.com/Title?0181852

    MPAA: Rated R for strong sci-fi violence and action, and for language and brief nudity.
    .. i am happy now
    http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/6324/fightclubmlzq1.jpg
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 06-10-2003, 08:26 PM #13
    blugh's Avatar
    blugh
    blugh is offline Trailer Master
    Send a message via ICQ to blugh Send a message via AIM to blugh
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, ON, Canada
    Posts
    949
    Credits
    1,075
    indeed it's good news.

    mmm boobies.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 06-10-2003, 08:31 PM #14
    editman's Avatar
    editman
    editman is offline rises
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Mel, AU
    Posts
    5,079
    Credits
    1,091
    Originally posted by blugh
    mmm boobies.
    It says 'nudity'. Didn't specify which part of the body or what sex. Arnie's or TX's naked butt can already be considered as 'brief nudity'...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 06-11-2003, 03:40 AM #15
    the_bronz
    the_bronz is offline Trailer Collector
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    252
    Credits
    1,105
    i bet 'coincedently' the hair of the TX falls over the boobs, so you cant see ****
    ahh well, ill like this movie with or without the TX tits man! far out!!:big grin:
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. T3 12 minutes videos
    By trailergod in forum Movie News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-06-2003, 09:25 PM
  2. T3 Trailer Re-edit
    By RoboDan in forum Trailer News
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-24-2002, 03:18 AM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules