Gladiator
by Dean Kish
Can a spectacular Cecil B DeMille style epic bring greatness and adrenaline
to the launching of the new millennium summer box office bonanza?
Russell Crowe stars as a stoic Roman General named Maximus who has been
promised the throne of the Empire which angers the current Caesar's son,
Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix). When Caesar Marcus Aurelius (Richard Harris)
passes on, a plot erupts to quickly deal with the "would be general-king"
and let Commodus ascend to the throne. The plot dictates that Maximus will
be beheaded before any word of his ascension can occur. Barely escaping his
execution, Maximus tries to make it home before Rome can unleash its wrath
upon his household. Just by mere seconds, Maximus is unable to save his
family.
Exhausted and wounded, Maximus is thrown into slavery and goes on dreaming
of what could have been. A small glimmer of hope seems to electrify him when
he is faced with becoming a gladiator. By using his skills as a general,
Maximus quickly becomes the toast of the arena. Maximus swears vengeance and
brings his fame to the grandest arena in the land, the Coliseum. But as all
historians know, "He who controls the Coliseum controls Rome."
Director Ridley Scott was once called a directorial genius with huge range.
Directing blockbusters ranging from "Thelma and Louise" to "Alien". Well
with the birth of his Gladiator, he continues with his tradition of utter
genius. The scope, magnitude and vision he has gathered together here make
it a definite candidate for the best picture of the year. I know we are only
in May but wait till you see it.
The other marvel in this film is the charisma of the film's star. Hollywood
has finally given Russell Crowe a movie that he greatly deserves. His
performance is very deep, stoic and reminiscent of Mel Gibson's "Braveheart"
What I found more believable within Crowe was the fact that at one moment
you could see his yearning to go home and the other blood-thirst as he
cleaved his sword deep into his opponent's belly. Delivering that kind of
scope in mere seconds amazed me. Sure Gibson delivered this kind of
performance in "Braveheart" but for me he was always looks like a crazy man
giving his all for freedom. With Crowe you see the tenderness and the
precision of a general in that one or two seconds. That is what makes it so
amazing.
The film's villain is right out of a Shakespearean/Greek tragedy. Phoenix's
devilish grins and obsession with his sister is so delightfully evil that
you yearn for Maximus to kill him. It's not often in Hollywood fare that we
yearn a hero to slay the villain. Heck, you, me and everyone will want to
kill this guy.
Take these brilliant performances and amalgamate them with a modern scope
seen only in films like "Spartacus" and "Ben-Hur" and you get about half of
what this movie is trying to convey. For me the other half was the
adrenaline. You can feel yourself screaming for the blood just like a Roman.
With some of my historical background I always thought the idea of people
brutally fighting to the death day in and day out was barbaric and
uncivilized. But that is the magic Scott has injected into Gladiator, you
actually feel what those Romans felt as they screamed at the top of their
lungs in the arena of champions.
I have never done this before as a critic but I really think this film
deserves it. Its been such a long time since I have seen something this
good.
(5.5 of 5) So Says the Soothsayer.
Gladiator
by Geoff Ross
Roman General Maximus vanquished the barbaric Germanians and for all of his
troubles his Rome casts him into exile. Okay, so there is a little more
to this. After emperor Marcus Aurelius abruptly expires his son and
successor, Commodus, condemns Maximus to death. Commodus views Maximus
as a direct competitor and therefore an enemy that must be squashed.
After an extended period of wondering the vast deserts of the middle east,
Maximus is sold into slavery as a Gladiator. The audience loves him...
enough that he finally makes it to the coliseum in Rome to fight in front
of 50,000 screaming spectators. It is here, in the coliseum, that
Maximus confronts Commodus again and a tale that will remain for many
years to come ensues.
Plot: The trio of screenwriters, David H. Fanzoni, John Logan, and William
Nicholson, had quite a task for themselves...an epic film like this one
hasn't been made since the 60s. Through blood, sweat, and tears they
created a script full of heroism, action, intrigue, romance, and all that
other good stuff. Gladiator is basically the story of one man, who was
wrongly imprisoned, seeking his vengeance. A story that has been used over
and over again. The fact that the main character is a Gladiator and the
story takes place in ancient Rome is an added bonus. But, what really
separates this film from the other mainstream dribble is that the audience
gets lost in the reality created by the writers. As soon as the first
scene, the battle in Germania, comes up on the screen the "real world" no
longer exists for the audience only the world of Gladiators and Emperors
is real. *****(out of five)
Acting: Oscar nominated Russell Crowe (Maximus) has lived up to his hype.
Every time the man is on screen the scene fills with intense emotion.
Truly an actor to be remembered for ages to come. Joaquin Phoenix, brother
of the late River Phoenix, is an actor to keep your eye on. His portrayal
of the disturbed Emperor Commodus is eerie in its believability. His
performance is equal, if not better than, Russell Crowe's. Plus, the pair
work together very well. Based on this movie, you'd think they were out
to kill each other in real life. This film was actor Oliver Reed's last,
he died during the shooting of this film, but this film is one of the
greatest he's ever been in. Reed played the role of Proximo, essentially
the Don King of Gladiator fights, a man who was once a Gladiator himself
who had been set free by the emperor previous to Commodus, Marcus
Aurelius. If there is any one film Reed should be remembered for it's
this one. *****(out of five)
Directing: Director Ridley Scott is known not for the quantity of his
films, over his 38 year directing career he has only directed 12 movies
and 2 tv shows, but the quality of his films. Scott is the same man
behind the camera on such classics as: Alien, Blade Runner, Thelma and
Louise, and The Duellists. In recent times, however, Scott has had a
series of so-so productions: G.I. Jane, White Squall, and 1492: Conquest
of Paradise. Gladiator is a step into the shining light of Ridley's
great films of the past, in fact Gladiator is one of his best movies to
date. Scott has always had a great eye for realism, which is most
apparent in his futuristic dystopia in Blade Runner, and because of this
the audience becomes swept away in his tales. Gladiator is, of course,
no exception. There is no intricate detail of ancient Roman society
unturned. But the major improvement in Gladiator from all of his previous
films is pacing. In comparison to his brother's, Tony Scott, directorial
work (Top Gun, Days of Thunder, Crimson Tide, Enemy of the State) Ridely
has slow-paced films. The pace in Gladiator is not too fast or too slow,
its, as goldilocks would say, just right. *****(out of five)
Music: Hans Zimmer, the composer behind just about every Dreamworks film,
has been working himself very hard recently. With four films coming out
this year, one already schedule for the 2001 season its very hard to
prevent scores from sounding the same. Luckily for the audience the score
to Gladiator is as an original. But not just that, its an excellent score
that actually induces emotional responses to the images on the screen.
Tension, anticipation, sadness, excitement,....etc. they are all there
within the soundtrack. To some it up in one word the work is
flawless. *****(out of five)
Special effects: Mill Film, the effects company for this picture, is
practically owned by the Scott brothers so it came to no surprise that
Mill Film was the company behind this picture. This film is the biggest
production Mill Film has ever done in its short five year history. The
biggest problem that the effects crew had to defeat was recreating the
ancient city of Rome. Shooting modern-day Rome for ancient Rome was done
in a handful of scenes, but modern day Rome is so different from ancient
Rome the majority of the scenes that took place in Rome had to be
augmented or fabricated digitally. The busy crews used every trick in the
book: Models, digital replacements, matte paintings, smoke, mirrors, etc.
Their work paid off, Rome, in this film, looks spectacular. My personal
favorite effect was the recreation of the 50,000 seat coliseum, absolutely
awe-inspiring. *****(out of five)
Bottom Line: Should I see this film? YES!! Right now! Its a film that
your co-workers at the office or your friends at school will be talking
about. You don't want to be left out, do you *****(out of five)
|