Thanks Thanks:  0
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Net Neutrality?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    L.A.~ lower Alabama
    Posts
    842
    Credits
    31

    Net Neutrality?

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_wguy/2...ch_wguy_tc1510

    First, a primer for the uninitiated on "net neutrality."

    Net (as in network) neutrality is the idea that all traffic on the Internet should be treated equally and more to the point should come at the same price. Right now, for instance, you don't have to pay more to watch a YouTube video than you do to check your email, even though the YouTube video eats up more bandwidth and, in theory, costs your ISP more for you to watch.

    Websites and most consumers love the idea of net neutrality.

    ISPs, on the other hand, are not fans. In fact, the net neutrality movement arose as a response to major ISPs' plans to attempt to charge websites and service providers more for "better" service on their networks. Fail to pay up and that YouTube video might take twice as long to download ... or it may not download at all.

    ISPs call this the cost of doing business and a necessary reality in an era where bandwidth isn't growing but the amount of data being pushed through the available pipes is.

    Net neutrality proponents call this extortion.

    No matter who is right, things were looking up for net neutrality fans after the FCC and the Obama administration came out with specific and strongly worded recommendations and plans that they would push for net neutrality as the Obama broadband program (100Mbps to everyone!) moved forward.

    But the showdown had already begun prior to the Obama era, way back in 2007, when Comcast, the country's largest cable company, began throttling BitTorrent downloads, effectively putting a speed limit on how fast they could go. The FCC put the kibosh on the practice, and ISPs, led by the mammoth Comcast, sued. Then the FCC announced even more sweeping rules that it planned to enact in the future.

    This week, a major legal ruling was handed down in the Comcast case, and the tide has now turned in favor of the ISPs. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals said that the FCC had overstepped its authority in mandating net neutrality and that ISPs should be free to manage traffic however they see fit, noting that under current law, the FCC does not have "untrammeled freedom" to regulate broadband services. (In other words, Congress would have to specifically grant such powers.) The ruling was unanimous among the three judges on the panel.

    Now net neutrality fans find themselves facing a serious uphill climb. Not only does the ruling open up the way for now for ISPs to ask websites and service providers for money; it might also allow them to restrict certain services from running on their networks entirely. Comcast, for example, may not want you to watch Hulu on its service, since then you'd have less of a reason to pay $60 a month for cable TV. It may also be able to ban VOIP services like Skype, so you'll pony up another $20 for wired telephone service. The dominoes are already lining up.

    What happens now? The FCC has more tricks up its sleeve. As the MSNBC story above notes, broadband service could be reclassified to fall under the other heavily regulated telecommunications services that the FCC oversees, but that would likely result in additional legal wrangling and longer delays for the broadband plan to go into effect, a so-called nuclear option that would turn the world of broadband into a bit of a bureaucratic nightmare.

    If it doesn't take this route, the FCC will instead have to ask Congress for the power to implement net neutrality rules as it sees fit, but that's a political game in a time when Washington seems awfully low on political capital. Don't rule out an appeal to the Supreme Court, either.

    Stay tuned for as long as your Internet service holds out, anyway.

  2. #2
    j7wild Guest
    yeah I hear you may not be able to use all your bandwidth to download anything anymore even if you are paying for 6mb download speed, your ISP will cap your bandwidth at 2mb max for example if you are download movies using a P2P program

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Greenfield, IN (near Indianapolis), USA
    Posts
    1,784
    Credits
    1,110
    Comcast, for example, may not want you to watch Hulu on its service, since then you'd have less of a reason to pay $60 a month for cable TV.
    That probably isn't the best example to give since Comcast will soon own a 32% share in Hulu (which is the current share held by NBC, which Comcast is acquiring). If Comcast restricts Comcast customers from Hulu, who will be able to watch it?

    Still, the concept is valid, even if the example is flawed.
    Corfy
    Laugh at life or life will laugh at you.
    Website | DVD Collection

  4. #4
    j7wild Guest
    Net Neutrality ends today.

    The FCC chairman Ajit Pai is a traitor who sold himself to the telecommunication companies like AT&T and Time Warner Cable.

    Before becoming FCC chairman, he was one of the staunchiest supporters of Net Neutrality.

    Then as soon as he became FCC chairman, he repealed Net Neutrality while insisting it will stimulate a freer open internet and the ISP will not charge the public to use faster lanes versus slower lanes.

    Someone needs to take a good look at the FCC chairman's bank accounts and see how much $ has been deposited into them by ISP using shell companies as fronts.

    http://www.wtae.com/article/the-end-...r-you/21252309

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...610-story.html

    This means if you use NetFlix, your ISP may want to charge you extra $ to stream from NetFlix at your fastest available speed, extra $ on top of what you already are paying monthly for your internet service.

    Here's what it means:


Similar Threads

  1. Net Neutraility...illustrated
    By Granite in forum General Chatter - Non-Movie Related
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-28-2009, 12:47 PM
  2. Best Video I've seen on the Net in a Long Long Time!!
    By j7wild in forum General Chatter - Non-Movie Related
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-25-2007, 05:48 PM
  3. Dr. Who screener leaked on net
    By renegade in forum General Chatter - Non-Movie Related
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-03-2005, 08:36 AM
  4. What do you do on the net?
    By Stormwalker in forum General Chatter - Movie Related
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-12-2003, 09:25 AM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •